AI’s Compliance Takeover

‍$30 billion of human drag: Why compliance is ripe for AI disruption

While general-purpose foundation models have captured early mindshare in the AI ecosystem and provide the necessary plumbing, the most meaningful and durable value creation today is emerging in vertical AI – purpose-built applications that combine proprietary data, domain-specific workflows and deep industry context. These companies aren’t just replacing legacy software; they’re creating entirely new capabilities and business models tailored to complex, regulated industries. And because the scope of work is larger, the market capitalization of vertical AI could ultimately be 10x greater than that of legacy vertical SaaS.

In banking alone, vertical AI applications could unlock $200–$340 billion in annual value. 

Compliance is leading the way, since it’s both necessary and non-differentiated. Financial institutions spend nearly $61 billion annually on financial crimes compliance – yet less than 1 percent of laundered funds are successfully intercepted, even as firms have paid over $47 billion in fines for AML breaches, sanctions violations and market abuse. Beyond enforcement risk, compliance inefficiencies are also a revenue issue, with financial institutions losing billions to delayed or failed onboarding – especially in fintech and embedded finance, where regulatory friction is highest. Meanwhile, many teams still rely on manual reviews and legacy Global Risk & Compliance (GRC) systems that generate high false positives, drive up operational costs and lack the flexibility to keep up with evolving regulatory requirements.

Vast troves of unstructured data and complex workflows have resisted waves of robotic process automation, yet a new generation of AI-native platforms is increasingly capable of handling core compliance workflows, streamlining reviews, accelerating decisions and reducing reliance on manual processes at scale.

From wedge to workflow: Where AI Is rebuilding compliance

To better understand how AI is transforming compliance, we’ve mapped out the current landscape of startups building in this space. While most begin with a narrow wedge, the long-term opportunity lies in expanding across the stack. The accompanying market map highlights where innovation is occurring across core compliance functions and how these wedges fit into the broader race to build a unified, AI-native back office.

1) AML - KYC / KYB

Traditional process: KYC and KYB are foundational components of anti-money laundering (AML) programs, but they’ve historically been plagued by manual workflows, siloed tools and long onboarding times. Traditional workflows rely heavily on human analysts to extract and verify documents, cross-reference entity data and evaluate sanctions and risk exposure across jurisdictions. These checks are often performed across spreadsheets, disconnected vendor tools and internal systems, creating delays, inconsistencies and compliance gaps.

With AI: AI-native compliance platforms are re-architecting this process from the ground up. By automating document parsing, integrating risk signals in real-time and orchestrating reviews through a single system, AI reduces false positives, accelerates decision-making and dramatically improves auditability. What once took hours and multiple analysts can now be handled autonomously - in minutes.

Companies: Leveraging Parcha, global payments startup Bancoli achieved 10x faster compliance reviews with 95 percent accuracy. Using Arva, fintechs cut KYB onboarding from days to seconds by reviewing unstructured data with more than 95 percent accuracy and reducing manual work by 80 percent.

‍

2) AML - Transaction monitoring

Traditional process: Most transaction monitoring systems rely on broad rules, generating over 90 percent false positives at some institutions. Compliance teams must manually sift through these cases, reviewing contextual information and counterparties without the help of integrated data. This work is fragmented, repetitive and often performed in outdated case management systems that don’t learn from prior outcomes. The downstream result is slow, reactive compliance: Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) are compiled manually, escalations lack clear decision trails and institutions struggle to keep pace with rising alert volumes.

With AI: AI-native systems move beyond static rules by using context-aware models to assess transaction risk dynamically. These platforms analyze historical case decisions, customer behavior and related metadata to triage alerts more accurately and reduce false positives. Instead of relying on analysts to manually compile evidence and draft SARs, AI can generate contextual summaries, recommend actions and auto-fill regulatory narratives – accelerating reviews while maintaining a full audit trail. Over time, these systems improve through feedback loops, enabling smarter decisions with less human effort.

Companies:

Sling, a global payments platform, deployed Greenlite’s AI agents to automate AML alert handling, cutting processing time by 50 percent and doubling alert capacity without adding compliance headcount. Fintechs and crypto exchanges automate 95 percent of transaction monitoring with Axle, cutting analyst hours and compliance costs by over 90 percent.

‍

3) Regulatory / Marketing content review

Traditional process: Reviewing marketing and client-facing content for compliance in regulated industries has traditionally been a manual, labor-intensive process. Compliance teams interpret complex regulations, cross-reference them with internal policies and meticulously scrutinize materials such as advertisements, disclosures and product descriptions. This approach is time-consuming, prone to inconsistencies and often delays the deployment of compliant content.

With AI: AI-driven platforms are revolutionizing this process by converting regulatory texts into machine-readable formats, enabling automated, context-aware compliance checks. These systems rapidly assess content against relevant regulations and internal policies, providing clear and actionable feedback. Automation accelerates the review cycle, enhances consistency and allows compliance teams to focus on higher-risk areas.

Companies: New York Life uses Norm AI to automate compliance reviews of marketing materials, reducing turnaround time from days to minutes while ensuring outputs align with regulatory expectations. Sedric AI monitors marketing and partner content across channels in real time, flags compliance risks and reduces manual review for faster approvals.  

‍

4) Communications compliance

Traditional process: In regulated industries like finance, firms are mandated by rules such as SEC 17a-4 and FINRA 3110 to retain and supervise employee and client-facing communications across email, messaging apps and voice. Traditionally, this has involved siloed systems, manual review queues and delayed supervision workflows. Compliance teams often struggle with fragmented tooling, slow retrieval and audit gaps, particularly as communication moves across new channels like WhatsApp, iMessage and Slack.

With AI: AI-native systems automatically capture and index communications across dozens of channels, flag risk in real time and surface violations with contextual evidence. These platforms enable searchable, WORM-compliant storage, customizable alerting and audit-ready records across email, SMS, collaboration tools, dramatically reducing overhead while improving visibility and defensibility.

Companies: AI-native platforms like Archive Intel automate supervision of employee communications across channels like iMessage, WhatsApp, Slack and Zoom, enabling real-time policy enforcement and audit readiness.

‍

‍

5) Trade monitoring

Traditional process: Firms are required by regulations such as SEC Rule 15c3-5 and FINRA’s Best Execution Rule to monitor employee and client trading activity, ensure fair execution practices and detect market manipulation. Yet most teams rely on static thresholds, legacy trade surveillance systems and after-the-fact exception reports to detect issues. These tools often lack real-time insight, context, or interoperability, making it hard for compliance teams to catch emerging risks or justify decisions during audits.

With AI: AI-native platforms unify trade and account data in real time, enabling anomaly detection, behavioral modeling and dynamic risk scoring across accounts and employees. Instead of manually sifting through trade logs and disparate data systems, compliance teams can now define flexible rules through no-code interfaces, detect suspicious trading patterns proactively and auto-generate regulatory reports with supporting context, thereby strengthening oversight.

Companies: New Range provides an AI-powered compliance platform for broker-dealers and RIAs, starting with automated trade reporting (e.g., CAT/CAIS) and expanding into real-time best execution analytics, anomaly detection and behavioral risk monitoring—positioning itself as the modern compliance OS for trade and account activity.

‍

6) Third-party risk management

Traditional process: Managing third-party risk, especially for financial institutions, involves a patchwork of workflows across procurement, infosec and compliance teams. Vendor records are entered into procurement systems (e.g., SAP Ariba) and assessments are completed via spreadsheets, PDFs and siloed tools like MetricStream and ServiceNow GRC. Each evaluation stream – functional testing, cybersecurity review and vendor due diligence – runs independently, with limited visibility and little automation. Questionnaires are reviewed manually, certifications are validated by hand and segmentation decisions (e.g., critical vs. low-risk vendors) depend on subjective human input. 

With AI: AI-native platforms are transforming TPRM by automating vendor assessments, scoring risks in real-time and continuously monitoring external dependencies. These systems use natural language processing to analyze questionnaires, AI agents to summarize SOC 2s and ISO reports and web scraping to detect news, ownership changes and regulatory actions. Importantly, they integrate with procurement and GRC stacks to reduce swivel-chairing between tools. As vendor ecosystems grow more complex and fourth/fifth-party relationships become harder to trace, AI is enabling proactive risk detection and adaptive workflows that reduce overhead and boost decision velocity.

Companies: Uber used Certa to automate supplier onboarding and compliance across 70+ countries, cutting operating costs by 50 percent and increasing on-time payments from 40 percent to 95 percent.  Coverbase automates vendor risk reviews for financial institutions, utilizing AI to pre-fill questionnaires, score vendors in real-time and reduce onboarding time from weeks to days. 

‍

7) Regulatory certification / licensing

Traditional process: Financial licensing, whether for money transmission, lending, or advisory registrations, is often managed using spreadsheets, outside counsel and email threads. Compliance and legal teams spend months navigating overlapping processes across jurisdictions, reassembling ownership structures and updating stale requirements, delaying launches and exposing real regulatory risk.

With AI: AI-native platforms are turning licensing into software. Instead of managing lawyers, filings and deadlines by hand, teams can now programmatically identify what’s required, auto-generate filings and track changes across all entities and states. What used to be a bespoke legal process is becoming a scalable, rules-based system that updates as the business evolves.

Companies: Ramp uses Vanta to automate GRC workflows and track global compliance frameworks in one platform, eliminating spreadsheets and enabling scalable, real-time oversight. Funding Circle leveraged Brico.ai’s platform to automate SBA lending license applications, – cutting licensing costs by 32% and reducing legal team time by half.

‍

8) GRC / continuous monitoring / testing

Traditional process: GRC spans a wide range of processes from regulatory applicability and gap analysis to internal audits, control testing, policy tracking, issue management and self-assessments.Traditionally, these workflows are managed with scattered spreadsheets, static documents and email threads, making it difficult to maintain oversight, keep pace with regulatory change, or prepare for audits.

With AI: AI-native GRC platforms embed policy, risk and control frameworks directly into team workflows. They automate evidence collection, enforce policies through integrations and surface issues before audits fail. Rather than managing checklists and folders, compliance leaders can now operate a real-time system of record, with dynamic controls, customizable risk scoring and AI-driven insights on where to intervene.

Companies: Crosswise.io is building an AI-native governance platform that connects policies, controls and workflows across the org, using LLMs to extract and monitor evidence automatically and help risk leaders prioritize action. Truist partners with Azimuth to automate compliance testing across consumer business lines, eliminating manual sampling and enabling full-population monitoring and faster reporting.

Building the standard

Today, nearly 90 percent of compliance spend in financial services is still on humans, not software. That may seem rational given the stakes, but it's fundamentally broken. Manual reviews are expensive, error-prone and incapable of scaling to match rising regulatory complexity or real-time risk.

AI-native compliance platforms are stepping in, not just to streamline processes, but to challenge the very nature of what compliance means. But here's the nuance: compliance isn’t just about having the right artifact – it’s about doing the actual work. Today, AI excels at generating artifacts (audit trails, reports, filings), but most regulatory obligations still require a human to demonstrate that judgment was exercised. That gap – between producing proof and doing the thinking – will define this wave of adoption.

That’s why most startups attacking small, artifact-generating niches will stall. Point solutions that automate a checklist won't win unless they can replace human effort in core workflows – licensing, onboarding, transaction reviews – not just dress them up with better UI. The prize isn’t automating the easy stuff; it’s convincing a regulator that the hard stuff – judgment – has been done correctly.

There’s another problem few are talking about: the wedge doesn’t scale unless it crosses categories. Every company says they’ll “land and expand,” but it’s unclear what earns that right. Why would a buyer choose your AML tool over your comms archive six months later, unless you’ve proven you can take human work off the table, not just repackage it?

Our hot take? The winners in this market won’t just make compliance more efficient. They’ll redefine what counts as “doing the work.” They’ll give regulators new comfort that judgment is being exercised – even when a human isn’t in the loop. And they’ll unify fragmented categories under a single system that consolidates budget, reduces vendor fatigue and makes the human-machine handoff explicit.

The race isn’t just to build a better tool. It’s to build the standard.

‍

‍